From immigration to nativeness in digital literacy: a mixed-methods study in Turkiye
Published Online: Mar 30, 2026
Email:
mustafakocaoglu@erbakan.edu.tr
Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
Email:
nkocyigit@erbakan.edu.tr
Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
Email:
mbceran@erbakan.edu.tr
Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
Views: 322
Downloads: 2
Download PDF
Abstract:
The term literate is used for individuals who can read and write. Digital literacy is the ability to use the internet and digital technologies effectively. People's ability to adapt to the production of information, developing at an unprecedented speed, is possible with digital literacy. The rapid dissemination of information via the internet can produce misleading results for individuals and societies.
This research aims to identify the digital literacy skills of digital immigrants and natives. The main question is: What is the level of digital literacy in individuals? Another question is whether there is a difference between digital natives who grew up with technology from the moment they were born and use digital language as their mother tongue, and immigrants who try to learn digital language but cannot get rid of the influence of their past habits and use this language with an accent.
Qualitative and quantitative research methods are both used in the study. In the qualitative study, data were collected from 42 headmen in the central neighbourhoods of Selçuklu District using semi-structured interview questions. In the quantitative study, data were collected from individuals born after and before 1990, residing in the district, using survey questions based on the digital literacy scale. According to the findings, the concept of digital literacy is not yet known, individuals aged 21-30, men, singles, and students have higher digital literacy levels. Problems arising from the inability to access opportunities such as digital technologies, due to infrastructure problems, should be resolved by providing communication training
Keywords:
JEL Classification:
M10, M12, M15
How to cite:
Kocaoglu, M., Kocyigit, N., Ceran, M.B. (2026). From immigration to nativeness in digital literacy: a mixed-methods study in Turkiye. Bulgarian Journal of Business Research, 37(1), 104-118, DOI: 10.46656/bposoki.2026.37.1(9)
References:
-
Adalı, G. (2023). An application of scale development for digital advertising with a focus on digital natives and immigrants. Turkish Review of Communication Studies, 42, pp. 39–62. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.1121774
-
Agárdi, I., Alt, M. (2024). Do digital natives use mobile payment differently than digital immigrants? A comparative study between generation X and Z. Electronic Commerce Research, 24, pp. 1463–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09537-9
-
Akduman, G., Karadal, H., Dinçer, E. (2024). Analysis of demographic variables affecting digital citizenship in Turkiye. Economics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2022-0092
-
Baric-Selmic, S. (2022). The Rise of Networked Seniors: Differences in Motivation for Using Social Networks Between Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants. In Ivana Barković Bojanić, Aleksandar Erceg (eds) Economics and Aging: Emerging Issues, Chapter 12. pp. 215–230.
-
Baturay, M. H., Yastibas, A. E. (2022). Digital literacy of digital natives: An EFL students' case. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Technology, 18(4), pp. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.18.4.18585
-
Cabero-Almenara, J., Valencia-Ortiz, R., Llorente-Cejudo, C., Palacios-Rodríguez, A. D. P. (2023). Digital natives and immigrants in the context of COVID-19: The contradictions of a diversity of myths. Texto Livre, 16, e42233. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2023.42233
-
Choudhary, H., Bansal, N. (2022). Addressing digital divide through digital literacy training programs: A systematic literature review. Digital Education Review, 41, pp. 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.41.224-248
-
Creighton, T. B. (2018). Digital natives, digital immigrants, digital learners: An international empirical integrative review of the literature. Education Leadership Review, 19(1), pp. 132–140. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1200802.pdf
-
Damayanti, W., Wijaya, N. R. Y., Rasuki. (2025). Literature review on digital literacy: Building basic competence among students in developing countries. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 5(1), pp. 216–224.
-
George, D., Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Pearson, Boston, 408 p.
-
Hatlevik, O. E., Christophersen, K.-A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, pp. 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015
-
He, C., Shi, R., Wen, H., Chu, J. (2025). Impact of digital literacy on rural residents’ subjective well-being: An empirical study in China. Agriculture, 15(6), 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15060586
-
Jantavongso, S. (2022). Toward global digital literate citizens: A case of Thailand’s aging generation. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 88(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12207
-
Kocyigit, N., Kocaoglu, M., Yıldız, E. (2024). Sosyal medya kullanımı ve dijital okuryazarlık: 6 Şubat depremleri temalı Twitter paylaşımları örneği [Social media use and digital literacy: The case of Twitter posts themed on the February 6 earthquakes]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 62, pp. 227–238. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1399206
-
Nahdi, D. S., Cahyaningsih, U., Jatisunda, M. G., Suciawati, V., Sofyan, D. (2022). Pre-service elementary teacher’s digital literacy with cognitive style and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(1), pp. 19–26. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v1i1.1862
-
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59, pp. 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
-
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, pp. 1–6. Available at: https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf (accessed: 12 August 2011).
-
Radio and Television Supreme Council (RTUK). (2025). Media Literacy Activities. https://www.rtuk.gov.tr/rtuk-genclerin-medya-kullanimi-ve-dijital-okuryazarlik-arastirmasi-yapti-/4401 (Accessed: March 22, 2025).
-
Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4), e14878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878
-
Sitepu, Y. S., Rajagukguk, M. (2022). Digital literacy competence survey in Medan city. Journal ASPIKOM, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v7i1.1067
-
Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi [Measurement of Attitudes and Data Analysis with SPSS]. Ankara, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. p. 224
-
Thangavel, P., Chandra, B. (2024). Digital immigrants versus digital natives: Decoding their e-commerce adoption behavior. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241282437
-
Tirado-Morueta, R., Aguaded-Gómez, J. I., Hernando-Gómez, Á. (2018). The socio-demographic divide in internet usage moderated by digital literacy support. Technology in Society, 55(C), pp. 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.001
-
Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). (2025). Household Information Technologies (ICT) Usage Survey. Accessed: https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/press/53925 (Accessed: March 22, 2025).
-
Urbancikova, N., Manakova, N., Bielcheva, G. (2017). Socio-economic and regional factors of digital literacy related to prosperity. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 21(2), pp. 124–141. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v21i2.942
-
Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? Studies in Media and Communications, 10, pp. 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002